Companies have actually the Mic during the NAAG customer Protection Seminar
Breaking News
- In a fresh post, Maria Colsey Heard and Ann-Marie Luciano talk about the National Association of Attorneys General (“NAAG”) 2016 Spring customer Protection Seminar, held in Washington, D.C. this week. The event that is semi-annual customer security staff from AG workplaces in the united states who’re accountable for starting and performing investigations and litigations under states’ broad unjust and misleading trade methods legislation.
Briefing by Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice People
- Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice customers Maria Colsey Heard and Sean Riley briefed attendees at an ongoing appropriate education event hosted by ALM, the publisher for the National Law Journal, The United states Lawyer, along with other appropriate news sources. The briefing, en en titled “State Attorneys General Investigations and Enforcement,” included informative data on sourced elements of AG customer security authority, current AG actions within the aspects of Medicaid fraudulence and privacy, and recommendations on what direction to go whenever a business gets an AG subpoena.
2016 AG Elections
Cozen O’Connor’s State AG Practice Co-Hosts Teleconference from the 2016 AG Elections
- Earlier in the day this week, Bernard Nash and Lori Kalani, Co-Chairs of Cozen O’Connor’s nationwide respected State AG Practice, shared their insights and prognostications in the ten 2016 state AG elections (5 incumbents, 5 available seats), as an element of Cozen O’Connor Public ways’ series of briefings in the 2016 election that is presidential.
- To know a recording associated with the briefing, just click here.
Customer Financial Protection Bureau
Arkansas Attorney General Requests the CFPB Hold a Meeting About Recent Federal Rule that is proposed Modifications
- Arkansas AG Leslie Rutledge delivered a page towards the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) asking for that the agency hold a meeting of this states to talk about the agency’s proposal for managing a wide range of lending options, including lines of credit, installment loans, deposit advances, automobile-title secured personal loans, and pay day loans.
- Into the page, AG Rutledge states that the CFPB proposition “ignores the interests associated with the states and seeks to impose a one-size-fits-all federal approach.” AG Rutledge writes that the proposed regulations would conflict with, constrict, and otherwise needlessly interfere with current state customer security laws and regulations, lending criteria, licensing systems, and enforcement that is regulatory.
- The page urges the CFPB to convene a seminar of this states to go over these problems before you take action that is further asserting that a meeting regarding the states would offer a chance to talk about different state regulatory and enforcement systems, just just what states have discovered from their particular efforts to safeguard customers, and just how possible federal-state conflict could be prevented.
Customer Protection
California Attorney General Sues Software Company for Allegedly Offering Prohibited Gambling Devices
- California AG Kamala Harris filed a grievance against pc pc pc software provider Pong advertising & Promotions Inc. (“Pong”) for presumably state that is violating and unjust competition guidelines by doing unlawful gambling.
- Based on the AG’s office, Pong’s computer computer computer software presumably ended up being found in computer gambling products in “sweepstakes” cafes across the state, which, in line with the AG’s workplace, operate as mini-casinos. Following the Ca Supreme Court ruled that the devices had been unlawful, Pong allegedly modified its pc pc pc software in order for users could redeem money awards by executing the “skill” of pressing a mouse to prevent a going cursor within a specified time frame. Generally speaking, games of ability are exempt from California’s gambling rules.
- The AG’s issue seeks relief that is injunctive roughly ten dollars million in charges.
FTC Settles with Health Supplement Marketers for Allegedly Deceptive Ads
- The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) reached money with Lunada Biomedical, Inc. and its own officers over allegations the business violated the FTC Act through the use of unsubstantiated claims to market that is deceptively supplement.
- Based on the amended problem, Lunada presumably made unsubstantiated claims that health supplement Amberan alleviates every typical manifestation of menopause and causes fat loss, and presumably additionally neglected to reveal their relationship with customer endorsers and falsely advertised high customer satisfaction and success prices.
- Underneath the regards to the proposed order that is stipulated Lunada must spend $250,000 of the suspended $40 million judgment, and it is forbidden from, among other items, making claims that a health supplement treats particular apparent symptoms of menopause, causes slimming down, or treats any infection unless they usually have individual clinical assessment adequate to substantiate such claims.
Texas Attorney General Reaches Payment with PayPal Over Privacy and Safety Disclosures
- Texas AG Ken Paxton settled with PayPal, Inc. over allegations PayPal violated the Texas Deceptive Trade tactics Act by failing continually to reveal to users of its cellular phone cash transfer application just just how users’ private information could be utilized and provided.
- In line with the AG’s workplace, PayPal’s mobile cash transfer application Venmo presumably utilized customers’ phone contacts without demonstrably disclosing the way the associates will be utilized, would not obviously reveal exactly exactly just how consumers’ deals and interactions along with other users could be provided, and misrepresented that communications from Venmo had been really off their Venmo users.
- Underneath the terms of the settlement, PayPal consented to pay $175,000 towards the State of Texas and enhance its disclosures to customers privacy that is regarding security.
Nyc Attorney General Sues Pizza Delivery Chain as well as its Franchisees for Alleged Underpayment of Wages
- Nyc AG Eric Schneiderman filed case against Domino’s Pizza, Inc., Domino’s Pizza LLC and Domino’s Pizza Franchising LLC (collectively, “Domino’s”), in addition to three Domino’s franchisees, over allegations which they violated state work legislation by underpaying pizza distribution employees.
- In line with the petition, the three franchisees underpaid pizza delivery employees by neglecting to spend the appropriate minimum wage and overtime prices, and failing woefully to acceptably reimburse employees because of their distribution costs. In line with the AG’s workplace, the so-called underpayments had been mainly because of some type of computer system that Domino’s allegedly urged franchisees to utilize for payroll, which under-calculated wages that are gross.
- The petition additionally alleges that Domino’s is in charge of the underpaid wages as being an employer that is joint of franchisee employees. In line with the AG’s Memorandum of Law to get the petition, Domino’s is just a joint company because it exercised an “unusually higher level of control of worker conditions,” and played a job in evoking the wage violations.
Environment
Ny Attorney General Settles with Diy Stores Over Alleged Violations of State Law Protecting Nyc Waters
- Ny AG Eric Schneiderman joined into two split settlements because of the Residence Depot, Inc. and Lowe’s Residence Centers, LLC to solve allegations which they did not show lawn that is phosphorus-containing in a fashion needed by state legislation.
- brand brand New York’s Nutrient Runoff Law, meant to reduce water air air air pollution brought on by extra phosphorus running off yards into ny waters, requires stores to produce yard fertilizers containing phosphorous individually from the ones that are phosphorus-free, also to create signs that notify consumers concerning the appropriate limitations on making use of phosphorus-containing yard fertilizer. Based on the AG’s workplace, Residence Depot and Lowe’s had been commingling phosphorous-containing fertilizers with phosphorus-free fertilizers within their shows and neglecting to show the signage that is required breach of state legislation.
- In line with the settlements, Residence Depot can pay $78,000 and Lowe’s can pay $52,000 in charges to ny State. The settlements further require both merchants to create their shops in ny into complete compliance utilizing the Nutrient Runoff Law.
- In-may 2015 the AG reached money with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. involving allegations that are similar.